POST 00804E : UNIVERSAL SAFETY BOX
Follow-up on Post 00794E
23 June 2005
_____________________________________
Ville Lehto (mailto:[email protected]) from Finland replies to
Franck Bouvet's suggestion
_____________________________________
Dear all,
I would like to comment Mr. Franck Bouvet's interesting idea of universal
safety box.
The issue of recycling - disposal from incinerator manufacturer's point of
view:
In general the incineration is not only about sterilizing the waste, but it
is a tool for final disposal. It is reasonable to sterilize and take the
material back into the industrial system in the places where recycling is
economically and ecologically viable. On the other hand, if the amounts of
waste are small, the distances are long or it is hard to find a buyer for
the recycled material, it is better to choose on-site disposal.
Waste disposal is putting material back in the ecosystem. Here we should
ensure that the solid liquid and gaseous outcomes are in the form that the
system can easily handle. Again, burial is a good option for waste that
decomposes relatively quickly in natural microbiological processes of the
soil, if the dumpsite is safe and controlled. However, it is not
environmentally sound to bury plastics.
The point is that there are different contexts and different subsets of
infectious waste, and their optimal management calls for different approaches.
Standardized safety boxes:
As I understood right Franck's vision of the universal safety box, they
would be used only for the sharp metal parts. However there are also other
items that have been in touch with blood or other body fluids. For us the
plastics are not a problem, and it is possible to incinerate even PVC
without producing furans/dioxins if you just avoid the conditions where
they are formed.
As mentioned, infectious waste is heterogenous, and optimal management
calls for different disposal methods for different subsets. Furthermore,
the optimal method for a certain subset is also highly dependent on the
context. When it comes to the safety boxes it is hard to imagine that one
type of the box could serve all the needs.
Yet, I think Franck's idea of standardization is great. There is just a
need to clarify the needs for different boxes in a way that takes into
account the special requirements of the waste subset as well as the mode of
disposal so that also the box is easy to recycle/dispose of (ideally by the
same method as the waste inside). After establishing detailed
specifications, one could expect the industry to go for the implementation
just as Franck explained.
I'm looking forward to having your comments! Should you have any questions
please feel free to contact me!
With kind regards,
Ville Lehto
Marketing Manager
Mediburner Ltd
FINLAND
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Visit the TECHNET21 Website at http://www.technet21.org
You will find instructions to subscribe, a direct access to archives, links to reference documents and other features.
______________________________________________________________________________
To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message to : mailto:[email protected]
Leave the subject area BLANK
In the message body, write unsubscribe TECHNET21E
______________________________________________________________________________
The World Health Organization and UNICEF support TechNet21. The TechNet21 e-Forum is a communication/information tool for generation of ideas on how to improve immunization services. It is moderated by Claude Letarte and is hosted in cooperation with the Centre de coopération internationale en santé et développement, Québec, Canada (http://www.ccisd.org)
______________________________________________________________________________
Il n'y a pas encore de réponse à ce message.