Article de revue
Do estimates of intervention coverage obtained from children at immunization clinics provide a reasonable approximation to population values?
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the magnitude of selection bias incurred by measuring child survival intervention coverage at convenient sampling opportunities (child immunization contacts) is sufficiently small for the approach to be used as a management tool within country programs. METHODS: We estimated the magnitude of selection bias by calculating values of 13 health indicators for 31 countries using Demographic and Health Survey data for children immunized with the third dose of the diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus vaccine (DPT3) and those who were immunized with measles vaccine- and comparing their values to those obtained for the population as a whole. RESULTS: Estimates of intervention coverage derived from immunized children are close to population values if immunization coverage exceeds 60%. Levels of bias were lower for interventions that were not delivered directly by formal health services- such as use of mosquito nets among children and provision of more fluid for diar
Langues
- Anglais
Année de publication
2012
Journal
The Journal of infectious diseases
Volume
Suppl 1
Type
Article de revue
Catégories
- Données
Mots-clés
- Qualité des données