POST 00869E : COMBINATION VACCINES, LYOPHILIZED VACCINES, DILUENTS AND VVMS
Follow-up on Posts 00847E, 00852E, 00855E, 00858E, 00860E and 00864E
26 December 2005
_____________________________________
Michel Zaffran (mailto:[email protected]) from WHO draws some conclusions
from this discussion started by his message of 26 October. At the same time
he answers questions asked by Anthony Battersby (mailto:[email protected])
from the United Kingdom, like this one raised by a reply to his query from
a vaccine manufacturer, and published here in the first part of this message.
_____________________________________
Below is GSKs response to my question about the suitability of keeping
reconstituted Pentavalent vaccine.
What is the basis for suggesting that Penta can be kept longer when it has
been reconstituted?
Anthony
-------------Forwarded Message-----------------
From: INTERNET:[email protected], INTERNET:[email protected]
To: FBA
Date: 12/12/2005 11:14 PM
RE: Tritanrix-HB+Hib Enquiry
Dear Anthony Battersby
Thank you for your query regarding our product Tritanrix-HB+Hib*
(diptheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenzae type
B vaccine). You requested information on the storage and stability of this
product once it has been reconstituted. I hope that the following
information is useful to you.
Tritanrix-HB+Hib is not marketed in the UK, and therefore I am unable to
make any specific recommendations for it use. However, it is marketed
throughout Europe. Section 3.2.6 of the European Product Monograph states:
"Tritanrix-HB+Hib is presented as a Tritarix-HB suspension in a monodose or
two-dose glass vial. Upon storage, a white deposit and clear supernatant
can be seen. Hib is presented as a white pellet in a monodose or two-dose
glass vial. The shelf-life is indicated on the labels and packaging. The
maximum shelf-life is 3 years. Tritanrix-HB+Hib should be stored at +2 C to
+8 C. Freezing is contraindicated, and if the vial has been frozen, it
should be discarded."
"The final vaccine is prepared by reconstitution of the Hib pellet with the
Tritanrix-HB suspension. The vial containing the reconstituted vaccine has
to be shaken to obtain a homogenous turbid white suspension. Check for any
particulate matter and discard if any is observed. After reconstitution,
the vaccine should be used promptly. If left standing, a white deposit and
clear supernatant may appear; shaking will restore homogeneity. Partially
used two-dose vials can be stored for up to 24 hours at +22 C. However,
according to WHO recommendations, the remaining vaccine must be discarded
after the end of each immunization session, or after 6 hours from
reconstitution, whichever comes first."
It would be a clinical decision as to whether the vial is stored for the 24
hours after reconstitution.
Kind regards
Michael R Keegan BSc (Hons)
HIV, Vaccines, Neurology and Critical Care
Medical Information Advisor
GlaxoSmithKline UK Ltd.
--------------------------------
The traditional lyophilized vaccines (yellow fever, measles) do not contain
preservatives because of the interaction of the preservative/thiomersal
with the live attenuated organism. Hence the diluents for these vaccines
have traditionally been some form of Water for Injection with no
preservatives. Therefore, The WHO recommendations, on the use of multidose
vials (MDVP) applied only to liquid bacterial vaccines which contained
thiomersal (and met other of requirements as spelled out in the policy
statement
With the DTP HepB - Hib or DTP-Hib, we have a lyophilized vaccine (hib)
which is not a live attenuated vaccine. It is a conjugated vaccine which is
not incompatible a priori with thiomersal and therefore can be
reconstituted and combined with DTP or DTP HepB (containing thiomersal)
The question was raised some time back of whether we should take advantage
of this situation and open the door to the application of the multi-dose
vial policy to this new generation of vaccines.
Some preliminary data of studies conducted in South Africa showed that it
was probable that the policy could apply (i.e. the effect of the
preservative would be such that an accidental contamination of the vial on
the first day --- which of course should be avoided --- would not result in
growth of the micro organism over time- the preservative would prevent this
growth and even reduce the number of colonies). In other words the risk if
not higher the second day than the first - hence the MDVP
The consensus at that time however was that , it would be very confusing to
the field to have some lyophilized vaccines for which the MDVP applies when
all others must be discarded at the end of the session or after 6 hours
which ever comes first.
The message I sent requesting views on a possible change of practice, was
trying to see whether the VVM was well enough established on the ground to
help differentiate between the different types of lyophilized vaccines
(those that must be discarded and those that could be kept according to the
MDVP) . From the range of reactions we have received it appears clearly
that this would be a very premature move
Michel
Michel Zaffran
Coordinator, Access to Technologies
Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals
WHO Family and Community Health
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Visit the TECHNET21 Website at http://www.technet21.org
You will find instructions to subscribe, a direct access to archives, links to reference documents and other features.
______________________________________________________________________________
To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message to : mailto:[email protected]
Leave the subject area BLANK
In the message body, write unsubscribe TECHNET21E
______________________________________________________________________________
The World Health Organization and UNICEF support TechNet21. The TechNet21 e-Forum is a communication/information tool for generation of ideas on how to improve immunization services. It is moderated by Claude Letarte and is hosted in cooperation with the Centre de coopération internationale en santé et développement, Québec, Canada (http://www.ccisd.org)
______________________________________________________________________________
There are no replies made for this post yet.